Not that I doubt you, I just don’t understand how a user bidirectional block works when other instances don’t support the feature.

How does that work from a technical perspective? Do non-piefed users still see you?

I’m not sure how or why it hasn’t been mentioned yet, but one reason blocking is the way it is, is because in a public forum like this, blocking somebody else from seeing your content is extremely open to abuse, while providing no real benefit from a protection perspective. As accounts are essentially free and unlimited, any malicious user can logout or spin up a new account to bypass your block.

On the abuse issue, it was previously shown with some testing on Reddit that by posting something offensive and controversial, then blocking everybody who responded in a negative manner, you could within 3 - 5 rounds of blocking reach the point where you could post practically anything and have it seen like a popular opinion, since everybody who disagreed with you and was willing to call out your bullshit couldn’t see it any more. Hence technical reasons aside, there are very good systemic reasons the blocking mechanism works the way it does.

Your post is about Palestine and Israel… How did Russia enter the discussion? I’m so confused I don’t even know what I should be feeling. Go to sleep dude.

Not stupid enough to be understanding this, thankfully.

Are you high? The entire post and comment is plain incoherent.

I agree. Nobody should be risking their safety / livelihood / whatever to host a random internet discussion site. That doesn’t mean we should leave the situation as it is. I believe the main concern is to move off the !europe comm there and onto the new one at [email protected]

Given that the main issue is they’re the host for !europe, an alternative comm has been set up at [email protected]

The mods don’t seem to think it’s a major issue, I haven’t heard any of them actually admit this is a problematic situation to have. Some folks have set up a new community at [email protected]

Germany, and any criticism of Israel, or dealings with thereof, that crosses a somewhat arbitrary (for those of us living outside Germany) line.

Gonna mention that [email protected] has been set up as an alternative for Europe-centric discussions

Mostly that they host the main Europe-centric comm, [email protected]. You can see the problem when criticism of Europe’s most powerful country is censored in said comm, and users banned, for relatively innocuous comments.

HBO Sometimes Max

He (was) in a relationship with somebody who should be committed. Does that count?

Assume. Presume implies you have some reason or evidence for that belief.

Edit: I find it hilarious how many people are downvoting me for correcting somebody who has just said they appreciate corrections.

The author sounds like the kind of player who complains about missing game features, then it turns out they skipped the tutorial.

No.

It’s perfectly possible for a TCG to be a deckbuilder, I’m sure. Especially video games that get to do all sorts of stuff to break the rules. My comment was directed at classical TCGs like MtG.

Stacklands looks pretty interesting, might give it a whirl

That’s reasonably close to what I was thinking, yes.

TCGs are not deckbuilders, at least not as they’re commonly understood today. See the other comment thread for the discussion.

More traditional boardgames like dominion aren’t rougelites

I was referring to video game deckbuilders. I couldn’t think of any, but I’ve had a few pointed out to me.