He forgot the red flag emoji.

Good. He’d have fucking spilled the beans

o3.

No “they” haven’t unless you can cite your source. Chatgpt was only released 2.5 years ago and even openai was saying 5-10 years with most outside watchers saying 10-15 with real nay sayers going out to 25 or more

Here are all 27 U.S. states whose names contain the letter “o”:

Arizona

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Illinois

Iowa

Louisiana

Minnesota

Missouri

Montana

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Vermont

Washington

Wisconsin

Wyoming

(That’s 27 states in total.)

What’s missing?

The biggest problem with LLMs as most currently use them is their inability to mull things over. To have multiple trains of thought and then try to intersect them and fork compilations of thought. When you ask a question it has exactly one chance to think up a response and no chance to review that thought or reconsider it. There are models that are allowed to do this but they’re generally behind pay walls because even the simplest of questions can lead into ridiculous tangents without proper guidelines on the prompt. Here the ‘Advanced resoning’ models response to the same question

Mammals known to build dams

#Mammal (scientific name)Dam-building habitKey reference1North American beaver (Castor canadensis)Constructs multi-year stick-and-mud dams on streams and ditches to flood an area deep enough for its lodge and food cache.2Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber)Same engineering instinct as its North-American cousin; creates extensive pond systems across Europe and parts of Asia.3Humans (Homo sapiens)From earthen farm ponds to megaprojects such as Hoover Dam, people build dams for water storage, flood control, power and more.

Why the list is so short

Beavers are unique. Despite a variety of lodge-building or burrowing rodents (muskrats, nutria, water voles, rakali, etc.), none of them actually dam a watercourse; they rely on natural water levels or on beaver-made ponds.

No other living mammal species has been documented creating intentional water-blocking structures. (The extinct giant beaver Castoroides probably did not dam rivers, according to paleontological evidence. )

So, when it comes to true dam-building in the mammal world, it’s essentially a two-species beaver monopoly—plus us.

https://chatgpt.com/share/683caddc-5944-8009-8e4a-d03bef5933a4

Also note that this response took a considerable amount more time than a standard response because it keeps reviewing it’s responses. But it’s worthwhile watching it’s thought process as it builds your answers.

deleted by creator

No they’re not. Do they outlaw drinking everywhere children might one day walk through.

I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you’ll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn’t saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states ‘where children COULD be present’. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

Ahh got nothing but lack of understanding and insults. Typical.

You say they have no knowledge and are only good for boilerplate. So you’re contradicting yourself there.

LMFAO. He’s right about your ego.

Holy shit someone on here that know how to use them. Surprised you haven’t been downvoted into oblivion yet.

“I’m not again LLMs I just never say anything useful about them and constantly point out how I can’t use them.” The other guy is right and you just prove his point.

You know you bring up a really great point. We’ve finally hit post-scarcity in an industry (information) and look at what it has done to us. Are we really ready for this in other areas yet. Should we use this as a chance to figure out how to integrate such a creation into society such that the next time this happens it doesn’t kill us all.

That’s basically like saying g all mmo’s should illegal. Or that it is illegal to go out of business and close up shop without giving away all your code.

So I looked into this being from Kansas it kind of pissed me off. Turns out she won with like 49% where the Rs got only 47 and two different third parties took about 4%. So Rs were pushing for it thinking those that cast third party would put them next over the Dem, while calling them wasted and spoiled votes. So this was proposed by the Wichita mayor under the guise that RCV was too complicated for people to understand, and likely kelly signed the ban because of fear she might lose her minor majority. Total fucking bullshit politics as usual.

It’s not anymore complicated. This is the exact argument that got it banned in my state. Because some people think we’re too stupid to count to 2. No if there are only 2 candidates you vore for one or the other and if you really want to be special you can rank them even if it won’t matter. This is not a difficult concept.

Wow. Another illiterate. Learn how to read.

KODI is calling.